Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed-2.0-Code vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Seed-2.0-Code costs 3.3x less per output token than Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($3.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed-2.0-CodeByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
Coding
87.3
Overall
82.8
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $3.00 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. Seed-2.0-Code is 3.3x cheaper.

Seed-2.0-Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a coding score, 87.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Seed-2.0-Code has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed-2.0-Code for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($3.00 vs $10.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; Claude Sonnet 5.5 on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed-2.0-Code not benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 5.5 87.3 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed-2.0-Code $3.00 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 $10.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Seed-2.0-Code takes 262K tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured94.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1768Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured92.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured6.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured83.2%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured58.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured61.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured52.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierSWENot measured61.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1819.1Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1513Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1504Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1817Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1741Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1737Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured13.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured56.0Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured166.2Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1306Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1257Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1244Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured83.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured78.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured30.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured10.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured75.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured59.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured75.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SpireClimbNot measured1.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$11,165Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured49.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured55.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured95.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured59.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured65.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1494Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1531Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1502Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1331Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured88.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured80.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured100.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1497Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1510Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured52.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured46.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1483Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1464Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1483Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1326Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1365Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1469Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1394Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1452Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1364Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured85.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26 boards measured
General benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeClaude Sonnet 5.5Leader
Vals IndexNot measured70.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured59.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.2%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured91.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
DTBenchNot measured97.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMCANot measured68.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured75.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1473Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1492Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1467Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1287Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1484Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1456Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1535Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1499Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1451Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1454Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1465Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1495Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1474Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1461Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1289Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1297Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1242Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.0020Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.0070Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.034Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.130Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.130Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.500Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-CodeAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5
MakerByteDance SeedAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 28, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$3.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked87.3
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed-2.0-Code better than Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a coding score, 87.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Seed-2.0-Code has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed-2.0-Code for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($3.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Seed-2.0-Code costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Code or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Claude Sonnet 5.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Code and Claude Sonnet 5.5?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; Claude Sonnet 5.5 on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next