Ripple 65B Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Ripple 65B Preview costs 1.4x less per output token than MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.60
- Coding
- 61.8
- Overall
- 61.8
- Output $/M
- $0.87
Ripple 65B Preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 61.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ripple 65B Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ripple 65B Preview for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ripple 65B Preview has none yet; MiMo-V2.6-Pro on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a AA Intelligence Index result, 29.9.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a Design Arena: websites result, 1311.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a Vals Index result, 57.8%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ripple 65B Preview
Ripple 65B Preview $0.0005, MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ripple 65B Preview not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 61.8 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ripple 65B Preview $0.60 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- Ripple 65B Preview takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 64.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1625 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.2% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 60.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 34.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | Not measured | 24.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1158.1 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1534 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1528 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1637 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1622 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1597 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| GameBench 2 | Not measured | 70.9 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Not measured | 27.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 29.9 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1270 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 84.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 77.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 36.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.1% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 54.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 79.6% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 49.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 15.2% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 34.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1511 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1539 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1517 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1283 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1265 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | Not measured | 70.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1495 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1514 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| AA-Omniscience | Not measured | -4.5 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1504 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1492 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1486 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1466 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1311 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1333 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1312 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1336 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1319 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1316 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1292 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 74.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ripple 65B Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 57.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 72.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 86.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| GDPval-AA | Not measured | 1692 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1492 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1492 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1468 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1503 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1475 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1528 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1477 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1471 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1503 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1469 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1463 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1270 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1274 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ripple 65B Preview costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ripple 65B Preview costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ripple 65B Preview costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Ricursive Ripple 65B Preview | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Ricursiveai | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | November 4, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.435 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.60 | $0.87 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 61.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ripple 65B Preview better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 61.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ripple 65B Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ripple 65B Preview for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ripple 65B Preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Ripple 65B Preview costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ripple 65B Preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Has any benchmark tested both Ripple 65B Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ripple 65B Preview has none yet; MiMo-V2.6-Pro on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of November 14, 2026.