Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Step 3.7 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 19.5, and Step 3.7 Flash costs 5.2x less per output token ($1.15 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
13
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.15
0
vs boards won of 13 shared

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Step 3.7 Flash: which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($1.15 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
13
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
100
Step 3.7 Flash only
5
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks, Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 25.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 76.2 against Step 3.7 Flash 39.6, 36.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 against Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) takes 1M tokens, Step 3.7 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.8 Max (0902)BarsStep 3.7 FlashTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
Web design70
General10
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding60.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev1674Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index76.239.6Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)85.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)34.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)24.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)68.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)12.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)28.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode53.2%43.9%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWE17.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured694.1Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1502Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: React1692Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1649Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1637Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index45.419.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index56.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1300Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1305Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1196Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1234Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1233Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets967Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench research69.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browser32.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agentic42.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
APEX-Agents63.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Search1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond93.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoning88.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)23.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%80.9%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.1%21.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles38.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1496Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1503Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math1501Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1491Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro88.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA Verified47.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science1512Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1503Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1492Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1480Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites12751196Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components13381177Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev13121158Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz12811173Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D13361129Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories12931182Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1084Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12001152Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench design78.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysis78.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)51.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal Index65.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBenchNot measured67.3%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%73.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench92.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCA46.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assembly20.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text1483Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1481Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1477Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision1313Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English1491Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1539Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: German1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1473Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1460Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: French1498Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1489Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1482Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1471Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1489Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1488Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1477Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1464Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: English1311Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1322Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humor1304Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1312Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Step 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Step 3.7 Flash
SpecificationQwen3.8 Max (0902)StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 3, 2026May 28, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.15
Coding index62.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$1.32Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) better than Step 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($1.15 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 and $1.15. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Step 3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next