Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Qwen3.6 27B on coding, 62.4 to 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.6 27B costs 2.2x less per output token ($2.70 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
1
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
19
vs boards won of 20 shared

Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B.

Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($2.70 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($1.30 against $1.32).

Shared results
20
Qwen3.6 27B only
5
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
94
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 37.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Qwen3.6 27B 11.9% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 64.7%, 52.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.6 27B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.6 27BBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge12
General04
All shared boards119
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index53.776.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%85.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.9%64.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode42.8%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 27B measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.445.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index146.2157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index18.556.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1190Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1232Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured993Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 27B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.2%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.9%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME91.1%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 335.1%74.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 27B measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.3%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.3%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%64.0%Qwen3.6 27B
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1512Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1282Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1292Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.6%51.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench78.1%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA34.5%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1460Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1464Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
EQ-Bench 41026Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationQwen3.6 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 27, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.45$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.70$6.00
Coding index36.862.4
Independent measurements behind it25
Cost per solved task$1.30$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B. Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($2.70 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($1.30 against $1.32).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Qwen3.6 27B costs $1.30 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.6 27B's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>