Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 21.4, and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs 2.6x less per output token ($2.34 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 59 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
59
vs boards won of 59 shared

Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($2.34 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
59
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
7
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
55
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 38.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 31.2% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 74.7%, 43.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5 397B A17BBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning09
Math05
Knowledge04
Web design06
General026
All shared boards059
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev14001674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode44.8%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench621.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding14641502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14631498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React13881692Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML14101649Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.445.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index146.8157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1190Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1232Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured993Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents24.9%63.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.4%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14621507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14501503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagrams12771323Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: homework12921336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 331.2%74.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14531501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14541491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MathArena19.2%51.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14571512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14551503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14411492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14351480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11901275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components11611336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev11401312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11751282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D11601336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11791292Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench87.5%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA37.9%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14371483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14241481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14021477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision12621313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: English14431491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14301473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14981539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14451478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese14291473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13841460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14621498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14411489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14301482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14471471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14461489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14411488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14151477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13991464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: English12681311Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: Chinese13141358Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: reading text12711322Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: humor12621304Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: captioning1230Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1265Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12601312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.39$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.34$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.4
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($2.34 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 per million input tokens and $2.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5 397B A17B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next