Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 1.7x less per output token ($3.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
42
vs boards won of 42 shared

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($3.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
42
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
4
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
72
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 54.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 1.3 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 56.0, 54.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge05
Web design06
General018
All shared boards042
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index22.176.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
WeirdML41.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding14241502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14311498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.745.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index1.356.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1190Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1232Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured993Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vending-Bench 2-$11Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)80.1%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts14161496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14631507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14121501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14351491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA Verified40.4%47.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: science14331512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14561503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14151492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14131480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites10521275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components9421336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev9561312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz9501282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D9971336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories10321292Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
DTBench80.3%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA29.3%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14151483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13861481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing13841477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14291491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English13971473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14811539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14081478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese13861473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13751460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish13891489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14011482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish13901471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14001488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13881477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.45$2.00
Output $/Mtok$3.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($3.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next