o1 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max leads o1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.5 to 15.2, and Qwen3.7 Max costs 13.6x less per output token ($4.425 vs $60.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.
o1 or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick
Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
- Shared results
- 22
- o1 only
- 47
- Qwen3.7 Max only
- 37
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max leads, 29.5 against 15.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Max has a AA Agentic Index result, 22.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max leads, 90.2% against 73.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only o1 has a AIME result, 71.5%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max leads, 89.3% against 83.5%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Max has a Design Arena: websites result, 1274.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max takes 1M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Max
o1 $0.045, Qwen3.7 Max $0.0037 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Max has the number, $4.69.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- o1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 36.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: o1 14.7% against Qwen3.7 Max 64.6%, 49.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- o1 $60.00 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 13.6x apart.
- Context window
- o1 takes 200K tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | o1 | Bars | Qwen3.7 Max | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 4 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 22 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 61.7% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1515 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| AA Coding Index | 39.7 | 66.0 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 50.3% | 87.1% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.7% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.1% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 67.9% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 49.5% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.9% | 50.8% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| WeirdML | 46.1% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1189.4 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1367 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1366 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1514 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1512 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| SciCode | 4.6% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.2 | 29.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.7 | 154.0 | Qwen3.7 Max |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 22.5 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1208 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1191 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1155 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1159 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1187 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1161 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1158 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1197 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.5% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 62.6% | 94.7% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| METR time horizons | 51.1% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 90.2% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 77.4% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.7% | 92.3% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | 40.5% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 76.8% | 90.9% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| ARC-AGI | 30.7% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| SimpleBench | 40.1% | 70.4% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chess puzzles | 10.0% | 26.0% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 32.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 9.5% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| VPCT | 37.0% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1371 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1361 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1372 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 71.5% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 90.4% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 89.3% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 73.3% | 95.6% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 14.7% | 64.6% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 34.1% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| MATH level 5 | 94.7% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1388 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1390 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 83.5% | 89.3% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 80.4% | 84.9% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.7% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.3% | 75.3% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 96.5% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.1% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.1% | 55.8% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| GeoBench | 80.0% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1369 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1355 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1368 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1328 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1274 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1270 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1265 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1275 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1266 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1275 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1217 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1211 | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.4% | Only Qwen3.7 Max measured |
| IFBench | 70.3% | 80.5% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 65.0% | 79.0% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| DTBench | 74.7% | 92.3% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| LMCA | 22.3% | 44.0% | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 70.2% | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1366 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1367 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1347 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1168 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1372 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1358 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1394 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1337 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1346 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1396 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1344 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1345 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1356 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1355 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1378 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1360 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1358 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1162 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1235 | Not measured | Only o1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Max costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Max costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Max costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI o1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 17, 2024 | May 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $15.00 | $1.475 |
| Output $/Mtok | $60.00 | $4.425 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 54.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $4.69 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is o1 better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?
Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, o1 or Qwen3.7 Max?
o1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.7 Max only.
Which has the bigger context window, o1 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the o1 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?
22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.