LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
9.2
Overall
14.2
Output $/M
$7.50
4
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
33.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
24
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding: it scores 33.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Shared results
28
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
52
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 9.2 from 1 benchmark, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 33.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 16.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Mistral Medium 3.5 1254 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1443, 31.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.00 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding05
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge22
Web design02
General210
All shared boards424
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDev12641437Beam 1.0 501B A23B
AA Coding Index46.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode40.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14601473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT14581461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: React12541443Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: HTML13081436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index7.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond34.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14361442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert14321447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14311459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14281430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14091376Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14371433Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14261430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites11421253Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev10791222Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1061Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1122Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG949Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1062Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBench75.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCA26.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text14211425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following14151430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing13741390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision1222Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: English14331436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English14041413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese14441424Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: German1453Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: French14481461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13951412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14231414Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14151429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language13841400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13821399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English1240Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1233Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1216Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1198Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0008Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.018Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.070Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerMistral AIReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$7.50$1.00
Coding index9.233.8
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$6.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding: it scores 33.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next