Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads Mistral Medium 3.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 14.2, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 7.5x less per output token ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
4
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
10
vs boards won of 14 shared

Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.6 35B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
14
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
67
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
6
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 8.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Surface Evolver Bench: Mistral Medium 3.5 26.9% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 44.4%, 17.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding21
Intelligence02
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
General23
All shared boards410
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
LMArena WebDev1264Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.941.9Mistral Medium 3.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode40.2%36.6%Mistral Medium 3.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%34.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1458Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1308Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.218.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4143.7Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index7.013.1Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%95.3%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond34.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%22.2%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1428Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1409Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1076Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1060Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1121Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG949Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1062Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench68.8%64.4%Mistral Medium 3.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%71.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
DTBench75.5%73.9%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMCA26.1%29.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%44.4%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
LMArena Text1421Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision1222Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1453Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1448Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1423Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1382Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1240Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1233Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1216Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1198Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.10
Output $/Mtok$7.50$1.00
Coding index25.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$6.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.6 35B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next