Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 14B

Mistral Medium 3.5 leads Qwen3 14B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.2 to 6.7, and Qwen3 14B costs 32.6x less per output token ($0.23 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
11
Qwen3 14BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
1
vs boards won of 12 shared

Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 14B: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 14B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 14B for output tokens 32.6x cheaper ($0.23 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by Kagi LLM Benchmark, where it leads.

Shared results
12
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
69
Qwen3 14B only
8
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 14B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 59.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Mistral Medium 3.5 69.3% against Qwen3 14B 0.0%, 69.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Qwen3 14B $0.23 per million output tokens, 32.6x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3 14B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsQwen3 14BTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning21
General40
All shared boards111
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
LMArena WebDev1264Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.3%Only Qwen3 14B measured
SciCode40.2%30.7%Mistral Medium 3.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%5.3%Mistral Medium 3.5
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1458Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1308Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.26.7Mistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4138.2Mistral Medium 3.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Agentic Index7.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%34.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
GPQA Diamond34.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%60.4%Mistral Medium 3.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%4.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured63.8%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%49.1%Qwen3 14B
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured58.0Only Qwen3 14B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMArena Text: science1428Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1409Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
Design Arena: websites1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1061Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1121Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG950Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1063Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench68.8%40.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%0.0%Mistral Medium 3.5
DTBench75.5%64.0%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMCA26.1%18.2%Mistral Medium 3.5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured62.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text1421Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision1222Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1453Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1448Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1423Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1382Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1240Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1233Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1216Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1198Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 14B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0062Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.024Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 14B
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 14B
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026April 28, 2025
Context window262K41K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.11
Output $/Mtok$7.50$0.23
Coding index25.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$6.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3 14B for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 14B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 14B for output tokens 32.6x cheaper ($0.23 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by Kagi LLM Benchmark, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 14B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B costs $0.11 and $0.23. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 14B?

Mistral Medium 3.5, with 262K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 14B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 14B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next