Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs 7.5x less per output token than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
4
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million).

Shared results
4
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
77
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 21.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: Chinese: Mistral Medium 3.5 1244 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 1107, 22.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructTies
Reasoning10
General30
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1264Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode40.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1458Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1308Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index7.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
OSWorldNot measured5.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond34.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%36.0%Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GeoBenchNot measured62.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1428Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1409Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1076Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1060Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1121Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG949Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1062Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBench75.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCA26.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text1421Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision12221107Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1453Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1448Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1423Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1382Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English12401115Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: Chinese12441107Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: reading text1233Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1216Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1198Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.043Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.170Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.80
Output $/Mtok$7.50$1.00
Coding index25.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$6.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.00 vs $7.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Mistral Medium 3.5, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next