Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Moondream 3.1

Moondream 3.1 costs 3.0x less per output token than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
14.2
Output $/M
$7.50
M Moondream 3.1Moondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $7.50 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3.1 is 3.0x cheaper.

Mistral Medium 3.5 or Moondream 3.1: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Moondream 3.1 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Medium 3.5 has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks, Moondream 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Moondream 3.1 $2.50 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Moondream 3.1 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
LMArena WebDev1264Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode40.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1458Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1308Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index14.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
AA Agentic Index7.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
GPQA Diamond34.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1230Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1428Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1409Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websites1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1061Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1121Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG950Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1063Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBench75.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCA26.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text1421Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision1222Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1453Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1448Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1423Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1415Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1382Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1240Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1233Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1216Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1198Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Moondream 3.1
MakerMistral AIMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K32K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$7.50$2.50
Coding index25.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$6.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Moondream 3.1 for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Moondream 3.1 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Moondream 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Moondream 3.1 costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Moondream 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.5, with 262K tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Moondream 3.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Medium 3.5 has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI); Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next