Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads MiniMax M2.5 on coding, 44.3 to 37.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M2.5 costs 2.1x less per output token ($1.20 vs $2.501 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
37.2
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$1.20
0
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
6
vs boards won of 6 shared

MiniMax M2.5 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick Hy4 preview for coding: it scores 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.2 for MiniMax M2.5.

Pick MiniMax M2.5 for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($1.20 vs $2.501 per million).

Shared results
6
MiniMax M2.5 only
62
Hy4 preview only
18
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.5 37.2 from 3 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 71.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: MiniMax M2.5 4.0% against Hy4 preview 75.0%, 71.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.5 $1.20 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.5 takes 205K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.5BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding04
Math01
Knowledge01
All shared boards06
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev13861631Hy4 preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.8%77.5%Hy4 preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench42.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ALE-Bench618.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1383Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13741653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML14141620Hy4 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2-$23Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond82.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1372Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1384Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
ProofBench4.0%75.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: math1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1378Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro80.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.0%83.8%Hy4 preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena Text: science1369Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1356Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1222Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1176Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1172Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1170Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench71.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench11.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
CL-bench Life6.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1338Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1393Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1171Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1334Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1364Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1345Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.0009Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.019Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.5$0.072Exceeds the context window
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.5 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerMiniMaxTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window205K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.834
Output $/Mtok$1.20$2.501
Coding index37.244.3
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick Hy4 preview for coding: it scores 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.2 for MiniMax M2.5. Pick MiniMax M2.5 for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($1.20 vs $2.501 per million).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Hy4 preview?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.5 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.5 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/minimax-minimax-m2-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="MiniMax M2.5 vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/minimax-minimax-m2-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, MiniMax M2.5 vs Hy4 preview</a></p>