Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs o1

Muse Spark Open costs 14.1x less per output token than o1 ($4.25 vs $60.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
4
o1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
44.6
Output $/M
$60.00
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Muse Spark Open or o1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
4
Muse Spark Open only
24
o1 only
65
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks, o1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 25.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Muse Spark Open 43.9% against o1 7.0%, 36.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against o1 $60.00 per million output tokens, 14.1x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, o1 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarso1Ties
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured61.7%Only o1 measured
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev1528Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured39.7Only o1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.3%Only o1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.9%Only o1 measured
SciCode58.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured12.9%Only o1 measured
WeirdMLNot measured46.1%Only o1 measured
ALE-Bench1590.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1367Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1366Only o1 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured4.6%Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured15.2Only o1 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1141.7Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.6%Only o1 measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
METR time horizonsNot measured51.1%Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured73.2%Only o1 measured
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured77.4%Only o1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%74.7%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%7.0%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured76.8%Only o1 measured
ARC-AGINot measured30.7%Only o1 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured40.1%Only o1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured10.0%Only o1 measured
VPCTNot measured37.0%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1371Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1361Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1372Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
AIMENot measured71.5%Only o1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only o1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured89.3%Only o1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured73.3%Only o1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured14.7%Only o1 measured
MATH level 5Not measured94.7%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1388Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1390Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured83.5%Only o1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only o1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.3%Only o1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.5%Only o1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.1%Only o1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured41.1%Only o1 measured
GeoBenchNot measured80.0%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1369Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1355Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1368Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1328Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
Design Arena: websites1317Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game dev1294Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
Vals Index48.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
IFBenchNot measured70.3%Only o1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%65.0%Muse Spark Open
DTBenchNot measured74.7%Only o1 measured
LMCANot measured22.3%Only o1 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured83.3%Only o1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured70.2%Only o1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1366Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1367Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1347Only o1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1168Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1372Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1358Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1394Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1337Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1346Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1344Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1345Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1356Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1355Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1360Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1358Only o1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1162Only o1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1235Only o1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and o1
BenchmarkMuse Spark Openo1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
o1$0.045Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
o1$0.930Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
o1$3.60Exceeds the context window

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and o1
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenOpenAI o1
MakerMetaOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026December 17, 2024
Context window1.05M200K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$15.00
Output $/Mtok$4.25$60.00
Coding index47.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than o1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or o1?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; o1 costs $15.00 and $60.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or o1?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs o1 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and o1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next