Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 47.4 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 3.4x less per output token ($1.25 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$1.25
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
12
vs boards won of 12 shared

GPT-5.4 Nano or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 3.4x cheaper ($1.25 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
12
GPT-5.4 Nano only
73
Muse Spark Open only
16
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 21.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.4 Nano 26.1% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 50.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 NanoBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards012
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)26.1%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)14.5%21.2%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)41.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SciCode47.2%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
WeirdML49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-Bench1004.51590.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: coding1404Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1402Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index16.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%61.3%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.0%26.3%Muse Spark Open
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)6.3%38.5%Muse Spark Open
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)44.8%53.7%Muse Spark Open
τ²-Bench Telecom76.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.7%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.3%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)78.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI51.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1381Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expert1396Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1387Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homework1225Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 344.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ProofBench5.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1409Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science1374Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1369Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1310Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1282Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal Index47.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBench75.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.7%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCA36.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text1372Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1362Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1315Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-English1359Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1391Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: German1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1343Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Korean1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: French1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1371Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian1363Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Polish1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1382Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1365Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1338Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1325Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: English1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1232Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1204Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humor1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Nano and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 NanoMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.25$4.25
Coding index44.847.4
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.14Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 3.4x cheaper ($1.25 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="GPT-5.4 Nano vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Nano vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>