LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax M2.7

Updated October 21, 2026. 57 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
57
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
28.4
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 57 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.4 for MiniMax M2.7.

Pick MiniMax M2.7 when output tokens cost 3.5x less.

Shared results
57
Muse Spark 1.3 only
35
MiniMax M2.7 only
17
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 28.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Muse Spark 1.3 82.9% against MiniMax M2.7 11.9%, 70.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3BarsMiniMax M2.7Ties
Coding120
Intelligence20
Agentic work50
Reasoning50
Math30
Knowledge40
Web design80
General180
All shared boards570
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev16591399Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding Index75.852.6Muse Spark 1.3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.9%11.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Code migration (Vals AI)27.6%8.7%Muse Spark 1.3
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.0%Muse Spark 1.3
IOI (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)72.3%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode59.7%50.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured45.1%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
FrontierSWE25.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdMLNot measured37.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
ALE-Bench1688.3599.3Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: coding15101454Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT15111446Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React16721388Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML16531401Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an image1640Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index48.122.8Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2145.8Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Agentic Index55.515.3Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building web apps1297Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1295Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1217Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1241Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1244Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1048Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research68.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%27.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.0%6.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%10.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%28.4%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured84.8%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
APEX-Agents58.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%87.4%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%29.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15031422Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert15191443Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15001441Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1330Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
AIMENot measured91.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBench58.0%3.0%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: math14971421Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14911437Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
MMLU ProNot measured80.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured60.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: science15071416Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14931409Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14991403Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14901407Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
Design Arena: websites13561243Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components13521210Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev13291210Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz13431233Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D13591195Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories13531233Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG13001136Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art12801136Muse Spark 1.3
LiveBench design74.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
IFBenchNot measured75.7%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%78.3%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCA53.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ExploitBenchNot measured13.3%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text14901405Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14791405Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14621354Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14951426Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14811382Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese15321442Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German15131398Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese14701260Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean14901314Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French15111424Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14961402Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14911383Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14901387Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871412Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14881418Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14701376Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14571360Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1384Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1319Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1293Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.7
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.7
MakerMetaMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026March 18, 2026
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.20
Coding index79.728.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.4 for MiniMax M2.7. Pick MiniMax M2.7 when output tokens cost 3.5x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax M2.7?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax M2.7?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.7's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next