Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 9.2, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 2.1x less per output token ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
52
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 52 shared

Muse Spark 1.2 or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
52
Muse Spark 1.2 only
45
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
22
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 41.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Muse Spark 1.2 72.2 against Mistral Medium 3.1 20.5, 51.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.2 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.2BarsMistral Medium 3.1Ties
Coding40
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning70
Math20
Knowledge90
Web design80
General200
All shared boards520
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
LiveBench coding78.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1534Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index72.220.5Muse Spark 1.2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)79.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)29.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)21.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)69.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode57.4%32.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
FrontierSWE12.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding15051433Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT15051436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: React1526Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1543Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.69.2Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic Index43.21.9Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: agents building web apps1221Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1210Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1181Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1222Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1179Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1085Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1172Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench research67.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic21.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
APEX-Agents45.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
LiveBench reasoning90.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.1%63.0%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.4%58.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)45.5%4.7%Muse Spark 1.2
SimpleBench74.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzles27.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14891426Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert14751408Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871435Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagrams13171175Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIMENot measured42.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured38.3Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured38.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ProofBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math14841408Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14801412Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU Pro88.3%75.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%62.0%Muse Spark 1.2
CorpFin (Vals AI)70.9%50.7%Muse Spark 1.2
TaxEval (Vals AI)80.4%70.3%Muse Spark 1.2
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.4%36.5%Muse Spark 1.2
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science15001444Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14961449Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government15171439Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14841418Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websites13121132Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components12981097Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev13011073Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz13341144Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D13011081Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories13121120Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVG1284992Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: ASCII art1284997Muse Spark 1.2
LiveBench design67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis76.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)90.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal Index69.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBenchNot measured39.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.0%42.7%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench94.7%67.5%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA48.4%19.1%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text14821424Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following14621398Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14361391Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision13041172Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English14831438Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English14761408Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese15091447Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean14621380Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French14951460Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish14841433Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian14831411Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15021418Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14731406Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14531395Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14431390Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English12911179Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text13131175Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.2Mistral Medium 3.1
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2026August 13, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.40
Output $/Mtok$4.25$2.00
Coding index55.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$0.64Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.2 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next