Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Qwen3.7 Plus on coding, 70.3 to 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 3.3x less per output token ($1.28 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 65 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Muse Spark 1.1 Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
58
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
7
vs boards won of 65 shared

Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.28 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.

Model AMuse Spark 1.1Meta70.3/1003 independent benchmarks$0.43 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
65
Muse Spark 1.1 only
31
Qwen3.7 Plus only
10
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Muse Spark 1.1 72.2% against Qwen3.7 Plus 46.4%, 25.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.1BarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding80
Intelligence20
Agentic work40
Reasoning52
Math20
Knowledge41
Web design71
General263
All shared boards587
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev1542Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index71.355.9Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)72.2%46.4%Muse Spark 1.1
Code migration (Vals AI)31.1%12.9%Muse Spark 1.1
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)69.3%52.8%Muse Spark 1.1
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%54.3%Muse Spark 1.1
SciCode58.8%46.1%Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding14981473Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14981473Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: React1532Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1540Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1540Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.725.2Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1147.0Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index25.817.5Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building web apps1207Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1199Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1175Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1178Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1103Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1183Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1195Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1155Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1042Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.2%38.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%16.4%Muse Spark 1.1
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)56.4%49.3%Muse Spark 1.1
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)1.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
APEX-Agents31.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,520Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index52
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond91.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.8%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%35.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Chess puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851460Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert14781466Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14801460Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams13051292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework12871295Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
ProofBench39.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14821467Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14871470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro88.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.1%66.2%Qwen3.7 Plus
SimpleQA Verified57.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14841464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14791464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14811451Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14701435Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites12701269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components12891258Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev12691261Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz12681276Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: 3D12601238Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories12761269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVG12351208Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: ASCII art12711143Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index263
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.6%39.3%Muse Spark 1.1
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal Index66.7%53.9%Muse Spark 1.1
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%73.0%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench94.4%84.0%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA49.9%37.6%Muse Spark 1.1
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text14781454Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14571439Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14351438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12931278Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English14781458Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English14711445Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese15151509Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German14691471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese14501412Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean14591413Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14921472Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14641457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian14821457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish14991449Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14841459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14621454Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14481437Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14381422Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English12921280Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese13481332Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text13011288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humor12881261Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: creative writing12531258Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Document14651444Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7 Plus
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 16, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.32
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.28
Coding index70.333.2
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.43Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.28 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-spark-1-1-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-spark-1-1-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>