Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 8.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 61 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
61
vs boards won of 61 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Shared results
61
Llama 4 Scout only
21
Muse Spark 1.1 only
35
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 59.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Llama 4 Scout 765 against Muse Spark 1.1 1287, 65.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding05
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning09
Math02
Knowledge09
Web design05
General028
All shared boards061
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index8.271.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCode21.3%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: coding12861498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12861498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.533.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic Index0.525.8Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1134Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond47.0%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%86.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI0.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12661485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert12351478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams11251305Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework11481287Muse Spark 1.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math12871482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12861487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro69.6%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%66.1%Muse Spark 1.1
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science12781484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12851481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12571470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites7501270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components7651287Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev7721269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz8961267Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1259Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories7891276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1234Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index028
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%45.6%Muse Spark 1.1
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%88.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench39.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench57.9%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA12.0%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text12791478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12481457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12491435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision11181293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English13041478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English12521471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12551515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German12731469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12061450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12071459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French12831492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish12781464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian12631482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish12651499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12651462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12691448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12421438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English11431292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese11061348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text11171301Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humor11021288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: creative writing11261253Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 5, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window1.31M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.175$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved task$1.276$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Llama 4 Scout costs $1.276 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

61 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next