Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 leads Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.2 to 6.6, and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 13.4x less per output token ($0.56 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.56
0
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 13.4x cheaper ($0.56 vs $7.50 per million).

Shared results
35
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
12
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
46
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 78.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 15.2% against Mistral Medium 3.5 94.2%, 78.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 13.4x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 70B InstructBarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1264Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.9Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured5.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured40.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%33.3%Mistral Medium 3.5
WeirdML9.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured764.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding12601460Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: software and IT12601458Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1308Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.614.2Mistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index125.9141.4Mistral Medium 3.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured7.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured4.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.2%94.2%Mistral Medium 3.5
BALROG27.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany6.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured34.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%74.8%Mistral Medium 3.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%13.8%Mistral Medium 3.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)44.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12411436Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: expert12091432Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12611445Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1230Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured41.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Math Index4.0Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME3.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MATH level 536.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12521431Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work12531440Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MMLU80.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12761428Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12571409Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: legal and government12831437Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: business and finance12351426Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1142Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1061Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1121Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured950Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1063Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured37.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured34.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBench34.4%68.8%Mistral Medium 3.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBench60.0%75.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMCA14.8%26.1%Mistral Medium 3.5
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text12611421Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: instruction following12311415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: creative writing12321374Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena VisionNot measured1222Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: English12941433Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: non-English12191404Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Chinese12151444Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: German12221453Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Japanese1132Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean11401384Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: French12621448Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Spanish12531411Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Russian12341395Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12561423Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: longer queries12411415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: writing and language12361384Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12301382Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1240Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1244Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1233Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1216Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1198Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 70B InstructMistral Medium 3.5
MakerMeta LlamaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024April 30, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.56$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.56$7.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked25.5
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 13.4x cheaper ($0.56 vs $7.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next