Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Qwen3.7 Max on coding, 82.2 to 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Max costs 2.3x less per output token ($4.425 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Kimi K3.1 Pro Replace Qwen3.7 Max
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
18
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
54.1
Overall
67.1
Output $/M
$4.425
0
vs boards won of 18 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.1 for Qwen3.7 Max.

Pick Qwen3.7 Max for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($4.425 vs $10.00 per million).

Model AKimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI82.2/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 MaxQwen54.1/1003 independent benchmarks$4.69 per solved task
Shared results
18
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
17
Qwen3.7 Max only
41
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 65.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Kimi K3.1 Pro 91.0% against Qwen3.7 Max 26.0%, 65.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3.1 ProBarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding60
Agentic work20
Reasoning10
Math10
Web design70
General10
All shared boards180
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
LiveBench coding81.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev16951515Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding IndexNot measured66.0Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured68.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.9%47.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
IOI (Vals AI)81.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SciCode60.8%49.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
ALE-Bench1932.81189.4Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: React17011513Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML17061512Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index46.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.0Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1209Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1156Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1155Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1124Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1055Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1149Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveBench research77.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browser75.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agentic39.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%15.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)37.5%25.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vals Science Index44.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured90.2%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveBench reasoning91.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)26.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)52.5%40.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured34.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
ProofBench91.0%26.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
MathArena59.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured55.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websites13251274Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components14001265Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev14101264Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz13001276Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: 3D14511262Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories13541274Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG13281214Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveBench design77.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Vals Index62.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysis79.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
IFBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)86.3%79.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBenchNot measured92.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMCANot measured44.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1100Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Max costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 Max
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 23, 2026May 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.475
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.425
Coding index82.254.1
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.1 for Qwen3.7 Max. Pick Qwen3.7 Max for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($4.425 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.7 Max only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K3.1 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Kimi K3.1 Pro's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-qwen3-7-max" title="Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-qwen3-7-max">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max</a></p>