Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Muse Spark 1.2 on coding, 82.2 to 50.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark 1.2 costs 2.4x less per output token ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
17
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
50.9
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.25
3
vs boards won of 20 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.9 for Muse Spark 1.2.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
20
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
15
Muse Spark 1.2 only
71
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 50.9 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 48.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Kimi K3.1 Pro 63.6% against Muse Spark 1.2 6.1%, 76.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3.1 ProBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding70
Agentic work12
Reasoning10
Math10
Web design61
General10
All shared boards173
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench coding81.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev16951534Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.6%6.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.9%79.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)81.9%21.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode60.8%57.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ALE-Bench1932.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1506Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1508Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React17011526Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML17061543Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index46.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1220Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1142Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1031Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1149Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1059Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench research77.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browser75.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agentic39.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%32.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)37.5%43.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)75.6%64.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vals Science Index44.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoning91.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)26.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)52.5%45.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1477Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
ProofBench91.0%43.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MathArena59.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1494Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1509Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites13251311Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components14001296Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev14101300Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz13001333Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D14511299Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories13541311Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG13281280Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1279Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench design77.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Vals Index62.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysis79.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)86.3%79.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1437Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1475Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1454Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1474Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1451Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1442Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 ProMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerMoonshot AIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 23, 2026August 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding index82.250.9
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.9 for Muse Spark 1.2. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?

Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Kimi K3.1 Pro's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2" title="Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2</a></p>