Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads Kimi K2 0711 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.5 to 12.7, and Kimi K2 0711 costs 1.9x less per output token ($2.30 vs $4.425 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Kimi K2 0711 Replace Qwen3.7 Max
Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.30
0
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
54.1
Overall
61.7
Output $/M
$4.425
20
vs boards won of 20 shared

Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0711 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 0711 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($2.30 vs $4.425 per million).

Model AKimi K2 0711Moonshot AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 MaxQwen54.1/1003 independent benchmarks$4.69 per solved task
Shared results
20
Kimi K2 0711 only
17
Qwen3.7 Max only
39
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0711 not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SimpleBench: Kimi K2 0711 26.3% against Qwen3.7 Max 70.4%, 44.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0711BarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Knowledge04
Web design05
General02
All shared boards020
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
Aider polyglot59.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench Verified71.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1515Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured66.0Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.5%87.1%Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured68.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SciCodeNot measured49.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max
Terminal-Bench27.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
GSO-Bench4.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML39.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1189.4Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1514Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1512Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.729.5Qwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index140.0154.0Qwen3.7 Max
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1155Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1161Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1108Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1171Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
τ²-Bench Telecom61.1%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA Diamond71.5%90.2%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.6%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%40.5%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SimpleBench26.3%70.4%Qwen3.7 Max
Chess puzzlesNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
AIME62.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math Index57.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured34.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU Pro79.4%89.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.5%84.9%Qwen3.7 Max
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.4%63.7%Qwen3.7 Max
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.2%75.3%Qwen3.7 Max
MedQA (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured55.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websites10501274Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: UI components10271267Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: game dev9731264Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: data viz10181275Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: all code categories10331275Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1216Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1211Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
IFBench41.5%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%79.0%Qwen3.7 Max
DTBenchNot measured92.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMCANot measured44.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)85.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-bench11.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711Qwen3.7 Max
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 11, 2025May 21, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.57$1.475
Output $/Mtok$2.30$4.425
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.1
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0711 better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0711 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0711 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($2.30 vs $4.425 per million).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.7 Max only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2 0711's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next