Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Kimi K2 Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 46.3 to 22.0, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 2.9x less per output token ($0.87 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Kimi K2 Thinking or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
Kimi K2 Thinking only
25
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
68
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 25.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Kimi K2 Thinking 23.8% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 49.4%, 25.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 Thinking takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 ThinkingBarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design01
General01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
SWE-bench Verified63.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1625Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)63.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SciCodeNot measured60.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench35.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdML42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-Bench597.51158.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1533Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1528Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1639Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1616Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.046.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1290Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
METR time horizons59.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.8%49.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1541Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1520Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AIME85.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index94.7Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ProofBenchNot measured70.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1500Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
MMLU Pro81.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1485Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websites11131308MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1340Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1314Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1336Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1330Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1317Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured57.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IFBench68.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%86.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
CL-bench17.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1504Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1474Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1479Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1501Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 Thinking and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 ThinkingXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerMoonshot AIXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.435
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.87
Coding indexNot benchmarked65.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved task$0.61Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 Thinking vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2 Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next