Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark Open

Kimi K2.7 Code leads Muse Spark Open on coding, 53.4 to 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($4.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.00
4
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
10
vs boards won of 14 shared

Kimi K2.7 Code or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open.

Pick Muse Spark Open for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
14
Kimi K2.7 Code only
37
Muse Spark Open only
14
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 13.1 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Kimi K2.7 Code 47.2% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 29.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2.7 Code takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2.7 CodeBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding16
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Web design02
General10
All shared boards410
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index16
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev14741528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index60.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.2%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)25.4%21.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)50.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCode47.8%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)44.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierCode30.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdML54.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-Bench886.21590.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: React14751529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML14511495Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: from an image1513Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index21.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1176Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1175Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1143Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1138Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1147Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building games1130Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1151Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1129Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
APEX-Agents37.6%33.4%Kimi K2.7 Code
Vending-Bench 2$5,083Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%89.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.0%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBench57.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 354.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
SimpleQA Verified36.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites12631310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1255Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game dev12201282Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1227Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3D1240Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categories1252Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVG1176Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1196Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench63.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%78.3%Kimi K2.7 Code
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 CodeMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerMoonshot AIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJune 12, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.95$1.25
Output $/Mtok$4.00$4.25
Coding index53.447.4
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$0.35Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open. Pick Muse Spark Open for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Muse Spark Open?

Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>