Kimi K2 0905 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Kimi K2 0905 leads Mistral Medium 3.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.3 to 14.2, and Kimi K2 0905 costs 3.0x less per output token ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.
Kimi K2 0905 or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0905 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Kimi K2 0905 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 11
- Kimi K2 0905 only
- 6
- Mistral Medium 3.5 only
- 70
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905 leads, 15.3 against 14.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 7.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 34.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 75.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 leads, 1142 against 1089.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 262K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905 $0.0019, Mistral Medium 3.5 $0.0053 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has the number, $6.02.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Kimi K2 0905 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- General, 21.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- IFBench: Kimi K2 0905 41.7% against Mistral Medium 3.5 68.8%, 27.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Kimi K2 0905 $2.50 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 262K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Kimi K2 0905 | Bars | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 2 | ||
| General | 0 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 8 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1264 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 46.9 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.4% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.1% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 40.2% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.5% | 33.3% | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| WeirdML | 36.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 267.1 | 764.0 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1460 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1458 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1254 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1308 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.3 | 14.2 | Kimi K2 0905 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 141.4 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 7.0 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.1% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.5% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.1% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.2% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 73.4% | 94.2% | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 34.9% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.7% | 74.8% | Kimi K2 0905 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.4% | 13.8% | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1436 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1432 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1445 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1254 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1230 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | 41.4% | Kimi K2 0905 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 57.3 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 57.3% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 9.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1431 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1440 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 75.3% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.0% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.9% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 81.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1428 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1409 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1437 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1426 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1089 | 1142 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1079 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1079 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1120 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1061 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1098 | 1121 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 950 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1063 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.6% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.7% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 34.8% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| IFBench | 41.7% | 68.8% | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 53.0% | 69.3% | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 75.5% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 26.1% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2 0905 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 26.9% | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1421 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1415 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1374 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1222 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1433 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1404 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1444 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1453 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1384 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1448 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1411 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1395 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1430 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1423 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1415 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1384 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1382 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1240 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1244 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1233 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1216 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1198 | Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2 0905 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Kimi K2 0905 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Kimi K2 0905 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MoonshotAI Kimi K2 0905 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 4, 2025 | April 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.60 | $1.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $7.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 25.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $6.02 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Kimi K2 0905 better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?
Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a coding score, 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0905 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0905 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $7.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0905 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0905 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Neither: both take 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0905 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?
11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 0905's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.