Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Ling 3.0 Flash on coding, 57.4 to 29.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Ling 3.0 Flash costs 35.0x less per output token ($0.1215 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI
Coding
29.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.1215
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
13
vs boards won of 13 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 35.0x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
13
Ling 3.0 Flash only
11
Muse Spark 1.3 only
83
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ling 3.0 Flash 29.6 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 35.8 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Ling 3.0 Flash 2.9% against Muse Spark 1.3 82.9%, 80.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ling 3.0 Flash $0.1215 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 35.0x apart.
Context window
Ling 3.0 Flash takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLing 3.0 FlashBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards013
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1657Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index50.675.8Muse Spark 1.3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)65.2%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%82.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Code migration (Vals AI)0.0%27.6%Muse Spark 1.3
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%72.3%Muse Spark 1.3
SkillsBench (Vals AI)27.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode42.0%59.7%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1671Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.148.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.2Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic Index19.355.5Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1075Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.3%58.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)0.0%40.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%62.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
GPQA Diamond84.8%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.5%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.7%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1504Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1515Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1501Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)Not measured25.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1502Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MathArenaNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro82.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.3%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1489Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured59.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured61.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1356Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1350Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1328Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1343Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1364Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1351Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1279Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBenchNot measured96.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCANot measured53.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1513Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1494Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1516Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1494Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1489Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1489Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1458Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0024Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationinclusionAI Ling 3.0 FlashMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerinclusionAIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2026September 2, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.0405$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.1215$4.25
Coding index29.657.4
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.05Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 35.0x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?

Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.0405 per million input tokens and $0.1215 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Ling 3.0 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>