Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Grok 4.6 leads Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 44.3 to 39.9, at about the same output price ($6.00 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
7
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which to pick

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Shared results
7
Grok 4.6 only
116
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only
2
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 4.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Grok 4.6 76.8 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 71.9, 4.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $6.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards70
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1617Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index76.871.9Grok 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SciCode56.5%54.1%Grok 4.6
FrontierCode48.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1597Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Intelligence Index44.339.9Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Agentic Index53.050.1Grok 4.6
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1234Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1291Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1210Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1200Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science Index38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured84.5%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
GPQA Diamond94.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%93.5%Grok 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%42.4%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1469Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1283Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1417Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MathArenaNot measured31.6%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
MMLU Pro89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
Design Arena: websites1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1282Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1275Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1292Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1238Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1279Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%80.3%Grok 4.6
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMCA48.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1476Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1391Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1455Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1425Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1272Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1262Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.0050Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.118Fits in one request

Same cost

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.460Fits in one request

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MakerxAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026August 12, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$6.00$6.00
Coding index65.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.82Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for coding?

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next