Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Updated October 21, 2026. 91 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 76.4 for Grok 4.6.
Pick Grok 4.6 when what matters is AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 91
- Grok 4.6 only
- 32
- Muse Spark 1.3 only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 scores 79.7 against 76.4.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 leads, 48.1 against 44.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 leads, 55.5 against 53.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a GPQA Diamond result, 94.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a MMLU Pro result, 89.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 leads, 1356 against 1289.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.3
Grok 4.6 $0.0050, Muse Spark 1.3 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has the number, $0.82.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Grok 4.6 76.4 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 12.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Code migration (Vals AI): Grok 4.6 44.6% against Muse Spark 1.3 27.6%, 17.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Grok 4.6 $6.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Grok 4.6 | Bars | Muse Spark 1.3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6 | 12 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 8 | 7 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 7 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | 1 tie | |
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 8 | ||
| General | 1 | 26 | ||
| All shared boards | 19 | 71 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index612
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 89.1% | 90.2% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1617 | 1659 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| AA Coding Index | 76.8 | 75.8 | Grok 4.6 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 95.6% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 17.2% | 10.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 76.2% | 82.9% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.6% | 27.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 1.0% | 0.5% | Grok 4.6 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 47.6% | 43.9% | Grok 4.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 78.3% | 72.3% | Grok 4.6 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 14.8% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 67.7% | 69.4% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| SciCode | 56.5% | 59.7% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| FrontierCode | 48.0% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 25.3% | 25.8% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| WeirdML | 67.3% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1508.1 | 1688.3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1466 | 1510 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1457 | 1511 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1631 | 1672 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1597 | 1653 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1603 | 1640 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 44.3 | 48.1 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.6 | 157.2 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index87
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 53.0 | 55.5 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1247 | 1297 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1264 | 1295 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1234 | 1217 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1297 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1276 | 1241 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1208 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1249 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1241 | 1244 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1048 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LiveBench research | 84.5% | 68.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| LiveBench browser | 64.0% | 80.0% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 40.7% | 40.4% | Grok 4.6 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 53.7% | 58.9% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 33.1% | 36.0% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 48.1% | 40.9% | Grok 4.6 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 62.7% | 62.7% | Grok 4.6 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 11.4% | 4.3% | Grok 4.6 |
| Vals Science Index | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 5.8% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 65.3% | 58.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,047 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index37
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 91.2% | 89.7% | Grok 4.6 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 30.6% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 94.9% | 94.1% | Grok 4.6 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 44.1% | 48.7% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 94.0% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 87.5% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 67.1% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SimpleBench | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 33.0% | 37.0% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 34.0% | 25.0% | Grok 4.6 |
| EBR-bench | 30.5% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1448 | 1503 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1469 | 1519 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1445 | 1500 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1285 | 1330 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1283 | 1296 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.2% | 99.2% | Tie |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 66.0% | 74.4% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 31.7% | 46.3% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| ProofBench | 51.0% | 58.0% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1417 | 1497 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1464 | 1491 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 89.4% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 86.3% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.1% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.2% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.7% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 49.3% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1437 | 1507 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1420 | 1493 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1429 | 1499 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1416 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1289 | 1356 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1294 | 1352 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1296 | 1329 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1283 | 1343 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1277 | 1359 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1292 | 1353 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1239 | 1300 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1278 | 1280 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LiveBench design | 79.8% | 74.8% | Grok 4.6 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index126
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 75.3% | 79.6% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.8% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 28.9% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 86.5% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 81.0% | 83.0% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| DTBench | 97.3% | 96.5% | Grok 4.6 |
| LMCA | 48.5% | 53.9% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Furniture assembly | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1429 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1431 | 1479 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1426 | 1462 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1308 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1433 | 1495 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1420 | 1481 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1476 | 1532 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1426 | 1513 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1378 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1391 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1455 | 1511 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1414 | 1496 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1421 | 1491 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1430 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1425 | 1487 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1456 | 1488 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1429 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1421 | 1457 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1270 | 1298 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1289 | 1384 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1272 | 1319 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1270 | 1293 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1262 | 1296 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | SpaceXAI Grok 4.6 | Meta Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | Meta |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 500K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $6.00 | $4.25 |
| Coding index | 76.4 | 79.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.82 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Grok 4.6 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 76.4 for Grok 4.6. Pick Grok 4.6 when what matters is AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?
91 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.