Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Grok 4.6 leads Muse Glimmer 30B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 44.3 to 17.5, and Muse Glimmer 30B costs 4.4x less per output token ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
5
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer 30B: which to pick

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
5
Grok 4.6 only
118
Muse Glimmer 30B only
0
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 44.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Grok 4.6 53.0 against Muse Glimmer 30B 8.5, 44.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.6 $6.00 against Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Muse Glimmer 30B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsMuse Glimmer 30BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Web design10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1617Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index76.849.0Grok 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SciCode56.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierCode48.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1962.5Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1597Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
AA Intelligence Index44.317.5Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
AA Agentic Index53.08.5Grok 4.6
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1234Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1291Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1209Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1250Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science Index38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
GPQA Diamond94.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1469Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1283Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1417Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
MMLU Pro89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
Design Arena: websites1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1294Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev12961144Grok 4.6
Design Arena: data viz1282Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1277Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1292Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1240Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1279Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMCA48.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1476Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1391Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1455Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1425Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1272Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1262Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Glimmer 30BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and Muse Glimmer 30B
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6Meta Muse Glimmer 30B
MakerxAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026August 9, 2026
Context window500K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.325
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.35
Coding index65.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.82Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Muse Glimmer 30B for coding?

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.35 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 and $1.35. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Grok 4.6, with 500K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer 30B comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Muse Glimmer 30B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next