Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Grok 4.6 leads Llama 3.2 1B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 44.3 to 4.8, and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs 29.9x less per output token ($0.201 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
44.3
Output $/M
$6.00
29
Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
4.8
Output $/M
$0.201
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which to pick

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for output tokens 29.9x cheaper ($0.201 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
29
Grok 4.6 only
94
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 71.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Grok 4.6 99.2% against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 0.6%, 98.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.6 $6.00 against Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.201 per million output tokens, 29.9x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 60K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsLlama 3.2 1B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
General130
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1617Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index76.8Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.9%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
SciCode56.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
FrontierCode48.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding14661070Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT14571056Grok 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1597Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index44.34.8Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index53.0Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1297Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1208Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science Index38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
BALROGNot measured6.6%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond94.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%19.6%Grok 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%5.5%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%23.9%Grok 4.6
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481044Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: expert14691007Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451087Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1283Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%0.6%Grok 4.6
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math14171086Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work14641098Grok 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.0%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14371055Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14201009Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government14291071Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14161000Grok 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1296Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1282Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1277Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1292Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1239Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1278Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IFBenchNot measured22.8%Only Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%6.7%Grok 4.6
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMCA48.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14291055Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14311031Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14261033Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English14331117Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English1420973Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese1476959Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: German14261014Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1391Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1455Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1421941Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14251030Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14561050Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14291030Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14211025Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision: English1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1272Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1262Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Llama 3.2 1B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0020Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0074Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6Meta Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
MakerxAIMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 25, 2024
Context window500K60K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.027
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.201
Coding index65.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.82Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for coding?

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for output tokens 29.9x cheaper ($0.201 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 and $0.201. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Grok 4.6, with 500K tokens against 60K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next