LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Muse Wonder

Updated October 21, 2026. 49 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
75.5
Overall
38.8
Output $/M
$6.00
1
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
48
vs boards won of 49 shared

Decision reading

Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 75.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.5 for Muse Wonder.

Pick Muse Wonder when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
49
Grok 4.5 only
71
Muse Wonder only
11
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 75.5 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 20.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Grok 4.5 31.0% against Muse Wonder 84.0%, 53.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.5BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding011
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design06
General114
All shared boards148
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev15531652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index72.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%49.5%Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%66.9%Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%80.4%Muse Wonder
SciCode55.0%60.3%Muse Wonder
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdML46.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench1309.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14741522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14711515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React15561641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML15671694Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.8Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index41.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1221Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1242Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1204Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1232Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1236Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench research85.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser44.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887$9,432Muse Wonder
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert14651513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641506Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%84.0%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math14601486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14821514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro89.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14641506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14631505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14411483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites12811361Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components12791371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev12631380Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz12671330Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D12571425Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories12761370Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1215Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench design78.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index114
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench data analysis73.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%80.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench96.5%95.2%Grok 4.5
LMCA45.2%56.8%Muse Wonder
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text14481502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14451491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14421491Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English14531507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14401492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14951537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French14571523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14491522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14561510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14621493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14451496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14341482Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Grok 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5Meta Muse Wonder
MakerxAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$4.00
Output $/Mtok$6.00$20.00
Coding index75.564.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 75.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.5 for Muse Wonder. Pick Muse Wonder when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Muse Wonder?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next