Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0711

Grok 4.5 leads Kimi K2 0711 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.8 to 12.7, and Kimi K2 0711 costs 2.6x less per output token ($2.30 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 19 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
19
Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.30
0
vs boards won of 19 shared

Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2 0711: which to pick

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0711 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 0711 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($2.30 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
19
Grok 4.5 only
104
Kimi K2 0711 only
18
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks, Kimi K2 0711 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 31.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SimpleBench: Grok 4.5 70.0% against Kimi K2 0711 26.3%, 43.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Kimi K2 0711 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.5BarsKimi K2 0711Ties
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Knowledge40
Web design50
General10
All shared boards190
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured59.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured71.2%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1553Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index72.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%70.5%Grok 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured55.6%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.8%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML46.4%39.4%Grok 4.5
ALE-Bench1309.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1474Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1556Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1567Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode6.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
AA Intelligence Index38.812.7Grok 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1140.0Grok 4.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
AA Agentic Index41.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1218Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1220Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1205Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1230Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench research85.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser44.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured61.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
GPQA Diamond92.9%71.5%Grok 4.5
LiveBench reasoning87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%76.6%Grok 4.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%7.4%Grok 4.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%26.3%Grok 4.5
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1465Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%64.4%Grok 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
AIMENot measured62.7%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured57.0Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1460Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1482Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
MMLU Pro89.2%79.4%Grok 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%81.5%Grok 4.5
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%50.4%Grok 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%70.2%Grok 4.5
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.4%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1463Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1441Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite50.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
Design Arena: websites12811050Grok 4.5
Design Arena: UI components12801027Grok 4.5
Design Arena: game dev1264973Grok 4.5
Design Arena: data viz12661018Grok 4.5
Design Arena: 3D1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12751033Grok 4.5
Design Arena: SVG1215Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1256Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench design78.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
LiveBench data analysis73.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%53.0%Grok 4.5
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMCA45.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured61.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured85.6%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-benchNot measured11.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1495Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1449Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1434Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Kimi K2 0711Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2 0711
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5MoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711
MakerxAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026July 11, 2025
Context window500K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.57
Output $/Mtok$6.00$2.30
Coding index58.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Kimi K2 0711 for coding?

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0711 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0711 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($2.30 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2 0711?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 and $2.30. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2 0711?

Grok 4.5, with 500K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0711 comparison based on?

19 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 0711's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next