Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads gpt-oss-20b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 10.0, and gpt-oss-20b costs 28.3x less per output token ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

gpt-oss-20bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.5
Output $/M
$0.15
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-20b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick gpt-oss-20b for output tokens 28.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
39
gpt-oss-20b only
23
Muse Spark 1.2 only
58
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
gpt-oss-20b not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 53.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: gpt-oss-20b 852 against Muse Spark 1.2 1312, 57.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
gpt-oss-20b $0.15 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 28.3x apart.
Context window
gpt-oss-20b takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categorygpt-oss-20bBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge08
Web design02
General016
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SciCode38.9%57.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Terminal-Bench3.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML40.9%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
ALE-Bench566.0Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LMArena Text: coding13071505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT13111505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.039.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index137.7155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom60.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BrowseComp-Plus50.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
GPQA Diamond68.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)68.8%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.0%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12741489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert12581475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12921487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AIME86.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
AA Math Index89.3Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
OTIS Mock AIME65.3%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math13171484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work13051480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU Pro71.6%88.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LegalBench (Vals AI)70.8%85.3%Muse Spark 1.2
CaseLaw (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)53.1%70.9%Muse Spark 1.2
TaxEval (Vals AI)63.7%80.4%Muse Spark 1.2
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science12961500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13101496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government12801517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance12841484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites8521312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz9331334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench65.1%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.7%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench68.0%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA14.5%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12881482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following12361462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12011436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English13031483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English12691476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese13151509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1255Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1244Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LMArena Text: Korean12361462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish12671484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian12781483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1252Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12681502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries12501473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language12381453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12161443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0019Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0075Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI gpt-oss-20bMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.03$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.15$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-20b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-20b for output tokens 28.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.2?

gpt-oss-20b costs $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-20b's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next