Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads gpt-oss-20b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 10.0, and gpt-oss-20b costs 28.3x less per output token ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

gpt-oss-20bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.5
Output $/M
$0.15
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
43
vs boards won of 43 shared

gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-20b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick gpt-oss-20b for output tokens 28.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
43
gpt-oss-20b only
19
Muse Spark 1.1 only
53
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
gpt-oss-20b not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 47.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: gpt-oss-20b 852 against Muse Spark 1.1 1270, 52.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
gpt-oss-20b $0.15 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 28.3x apart.
Context window
gpt-oss-20b takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categorygpt-oss-20bBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge08
Web design02
General019
All shared boards043
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.4%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SciCode38.9%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Terminal-Bench3.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
WeirdML40.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
ALE-Bench566.0Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
LMArena Text: coding13071498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13111498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.033.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index137.7154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1195Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1042Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom60.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
BrowseComp-Plus50.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond68.9%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)68.8%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.0%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12741485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert12581478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12921480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME86.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
AA Math Index89.3Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.3%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
OTIS Mock AIME65.3%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13171482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13051487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro71.6%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)70.8%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)53.1%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)63.7%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science12961484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13101479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12801481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12841470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites8521270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1289Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz9331268Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1235Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1271Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench65.1%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-20b measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.7%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench68.0%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA14.5%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text12881478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12361457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12011435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13031478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English12691471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese13151515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German12551469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12441450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12361459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish12671464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian12781482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish12521499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn12681484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12501462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12381448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12161438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0019Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

gpt-oss-20b$0.0075Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

gpt-oss-20b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of gpt-oss-20b and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI gpt-oss-20bMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.03$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.15$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-20b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-20b for output tokens 28.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.1?

gpt-oss-20b costs $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-20b or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-20b's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next