Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads gpt-oss-120b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b costs 8.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

gpt-oss-120bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
49
vs boards won of 49 shared

gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.51 against $0.64).

Shared results
49
gpt-oss-120b only
32
Muse Spark 1.2 only
48
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 44.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI): gpt-oss-120b 33.6% against Muse Spark 1.2 86.6%, 53.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
gpt-oss-120b $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categorygpt-oss-120bBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work02
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge08
Web design06
General017
All shared boards049
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Aider polyglot41.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index30.472.2Muse Spark 1.2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)33.6%86.6%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)87.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SciCode34.0%57.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)23.5%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Terminal-Bench18.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML48.2%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
ALE-Bench575.6Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: coding13791505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT13871505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.639.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index139.8155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic Index3.743.2Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom65.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
APEX-Agents4.4%45.4%Muse Spark 1.2
METR time horizons56.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Vending-Bench 2-$22Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
BrowseComp-Plus67.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
GPQA Diamond78.5%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.6%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleBench22.1%74.5%Muse Spark 1.2
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Mystery game puzzles2.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert13561475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13681487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark58.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AIME92.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
AA Math Index93.4Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)93.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math13891484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work13861480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU Pro79.2%88.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.9%85.3%Muse Spark 1.2
CaseLaw (Vals AI)48.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.2%70.9%Muse Spark 1.2
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.6%80.4%Muse Spark 1.2
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science13821500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13881496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government13551517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance13591484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites9671312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components9241298Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev9921301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz9871334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D9011301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories9621312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench69.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.0%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench76.3%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA22.1%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.1%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Surface Evolver Bench25.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text13661482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following13181462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12741436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English13751483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English13511476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese13851509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1353Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: Korean12821462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French13701495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish13891484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian13431483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1353Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13401502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries13191473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language13061453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12921443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.0065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.025Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI gpt-oss-120bMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved task$0.51$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is gpt-oss-120b better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.51 against $0.64).

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.2?

gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, gpt-oss-120b costs $0.51 and Muse Spark 1.2 $0.64.

Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-120b's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next