Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads gpt-oss-120b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b costs 8.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 58 benchmarks have a result for both.

gpt-oss-120bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
58
vs boards won of 58 shared

gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
58
gpt-oss-120b only
27
Muse Spark 1.1 only
46
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 39.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI): gpt-oss-120b 33.6% against Muse Spark 1.1 82.0%, 48.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
gpt-oss-120b $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categorygpt-oss-120bBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work03
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge010
Web design06
General022
All shared boards058
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Aider polyglot41.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index30.471.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.2%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)33.6%82.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)87.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SciCode34.0%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)23.5%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Terminal-Bench18.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
WeirdML48.2%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
ALE-Bench575.6Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: coding13791498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13871498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCode7.7%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.633.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index139.8154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic Index3.725.8Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1134Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom65.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
APEX-Agents4.4%31.8%Muse Spark 1.1
METR time horizons56.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Vending-Bench 2-$22$6,520Muse Spark 1.1
BrowseComp-Plus67.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond78.5%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.6%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleBench22.1%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles2.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert13561478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13681480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark58.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME92.6%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
AA Math Index93.4Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)93.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13891482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13861487Muse Spark 1.1
MathArena15.1%42.5%Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro79.2%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.9%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)48.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.2%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.6%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13821484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13881479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13551481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13591470Muse Spark 1.1
PRBench Finance43.8%55.0%Muse Spark 1.1
PRBench Legal40.2%57.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites9681270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components9241287Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev9911269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz9871267Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D9011259Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories9621276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1234Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
General benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench69.0%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.0%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench76.3%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA22.1%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)77.1%Not measuredOnly gpt-oss-120b measured
Surface Evolver Bench25.0%52.5%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text13661478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13181457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12741435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13751478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13511471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese13851515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German13531469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13311450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12821459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French13701492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish13891464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian13431482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish13531499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn13401484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13191462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13061448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12921438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallenge45.3%75.3%Muse Spark 1.1
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.0065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

gpt-oss-120b$0.025Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of gpt-oss-120b and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI gpt-oss-120bMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved task$0.51$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is gpt-oss-120b better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.1?

gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, gpt-oss-120b costs $0.51 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

58 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-120b's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next