Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Sol vs Mistral Large

Updated October 21, 2026. 32 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-6 SolOpenAI
Coding
76.0
Overall
47.6
Output $/M
$10.00
32
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 32 shared

Decision reading

Only GPT-6 Sol has a coding score, 76.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 1.7x less.

Shared results
32
GPT-6 Sol only
68
Mistral Large only
12
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Sol 76.0 from 5 benchmarks, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 46.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Epoch Capabilities Index: GPT-6 Sol 163.7 against Mistral Large 122.1, 52.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Sol $10.00 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Sol takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 SolBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
General180
All shared boards320
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
LiveBench coding93.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev1683Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Code migration (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
IOI (Vals AI)82.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
SciCode57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
FrontierCode49.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
ALE-Bench2462.0Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: coding14481275GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: software and IT14331274GPT-6 Sol
LMArena WebDev: React1685Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1685Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1660Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index47.65.8GPT-6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index163.7122.1GPT-6 Sol
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1231Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1238Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1210Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench research69.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench long agentic66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)30.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)15.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)71.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Vals Science Index45.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
APEX-Agents54.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
SpireClimb7.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Vending-Bench 2$14,428Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.9%3.5%GPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
ARC-AGI95.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
ARC-AGI-289.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Chess puzzles56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Mystery game puzzles56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
EBR-bench53.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221257GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: expert14371208GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201268GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision: diagrams1270Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: homework1286Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 389.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tier 490.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
ProofBench83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: math14071261GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: mathematical work14241257GPT-6 Sol
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
SimpleQA Verified60.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: science13891260GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13661255GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: legal and government13961275GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: business and finance13801238GPT-6 Sol
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: websites1292Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: UI components1291Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: game dev1314Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: data viz1269Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: 3D1320Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: all code categories1301Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: SVG1315Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1226Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench design82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
LiveBench data analysis81.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
DTBench97.3%60.8%GPT-6 Sol
LMCA59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Furniture assembly58.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text13981265GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: instruction following14131249GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: creative writing13781242GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: English13961284GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: non-English13881235GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Chinese14121239GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: German13791242GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Japanese13771170GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Korean13361202GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: French13991325GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Spanish13871268GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Russian14021252GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Polish13721157GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: multi-turn14141260GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: longer queries14161261GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: writing and language13891261GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731230GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision: English1229Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1258Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1219Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Sol$0.0070Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Sol$0.130Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Sol$0.500Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Sol and Mistral Large
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 SolMistral Large
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026February 26, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding index76.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Mistral Large for coding?

Only GPT-6 Sol has a coding score, 76.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 1.7x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Mistral Large?

GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Sol or Mistral Large?

GPT-6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Sol vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6 Sol's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next