GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.6
Updated October 21, 2026. 98 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GPT-6 Sol for coding: it scores 82.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 76.4 for Grok 4.6.
Pick Grok 4.6 when output tokens cost 1.7x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 98
- GPT-6 Sol only
- 2
- Grok 4.6 only
- 25
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol scores 82.8 against 76.4.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol leads, 47.6 against 44.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a AA Agentic Index result, 53.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a GPQA Diamond result, 94.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a MMLU Pro result, 89.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol leads, 1292 against 1289.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.6
GPT-6 Sol $0.0070, Grok 4.6 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has the number, $0.82.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-6 Sol 82.8 from 2 benchmarks, Grok 4.6 76.4 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 20.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: GPT-6 Sol 90.0% against Grok 4.6 31.7%, 58.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-6 Sol $10.00 against Grok 4.6 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-6 Sol takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.6 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-6 Sol | Bars | Grok 4.6 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 15 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 7 | 8 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 6 | ||
| Math | 4 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 3 | ||
| General | 5 | 23 | 1 tie | |
| All shared boards | 49 | 48 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index152
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 93.1% | 89.1% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena WebDev | 1683 | 1617 | GPT-6 Sol |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 76.8 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 95.6% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 44.4% | 17.2% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 87.8% | 76.2% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 57.2% | 44.6% | GPT-6 Sol |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.0% | 1.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 82.6% | 47.6% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 83.2% | 78.3% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 78.0% | 67.7% | GPT-6 Sol |
| SciCode | 57.6% | 56.5% | GPT-6 Sol |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | 48.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 25.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 67.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2462.0 | 1508.1 | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1448 | 1466 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1433 | 1457 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1685 | 1631 | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1685 | 1597 | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1660 | 1603 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 47.6 | 44.3 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.7 | 156.6 | GPT-6 Sol |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index78
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 53.0 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1232 | 1247 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1238 | 1264 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1216 | 1234 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1297 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1276 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1208 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1249 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1241 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench research | 69.3% | 84.5% | Grok 4.6 |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | 64.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LiveBench long agentic | 66.9% | 40.7% | GPT-6 Sol |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 30.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Sol measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 49.0% | 53.7% | Grok 4.6 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 15.0% | 33.1% | Grok 4.6 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 28.9% | 48.1% | Grok 4.6 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 71.5% | 62.7% | GPT-6 Sol |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 74.8% | 72.2% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 30.0% | 11.4% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Vals Science Index | 45.0% | 38.1% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 54.3% | 65.3% | Grok 4.6 |
| SpireClimb | 7.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Sol measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $14,428 | $9,047 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index86
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 94.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.7% | 91.2% | Grok 4.6 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 30.2% | 30.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 94.9% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 47.9% | 44.1% | GPT-6 Sol |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 94.3% | 94.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| ARC-AGI | 95.5% | 87.5% | GPT-6 Sol |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.6% | 67.1% | GPT-6 Sol |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 75.9% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 56.0% | 33.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Mystery game puzzles | 56.0% | 34.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| EBR-bench | 53.3% | 30.5% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1422 | 1448 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1437 | 1469 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1420 | 1445 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1270 | 1285 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1286 | 1283 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 99.2% | GPT-6 Sol |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 89.8% | 66.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 90.0% | 31.7% | GPT-6 Sol |
| ProofBench | 83.0% | 51.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena Text: math | 1407 | 1417 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1424 | 1464 | Grok 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 89.4% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.1% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.1% | 44.7% | GPT-6 Sol |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.7% | 49.3% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena Text: science | 1389 | 1437 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1366 | 1420 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1396 | 1429 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1380 | 1416 | Grok 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index63
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1292 | 1289 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1292 | 1294 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1313 | 1296 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1269 | 1283 | Grok 4.6 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1322 | 1277 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1301 | 1292 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1318 | 1239 | GPT-6 Sol |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1226 | 1278 | Grok 4.6 |
| LiveBench design | 82.2% | 79.8% | GPT-6 Sol |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index523
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.2% | 75.3% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 56.6% | 66.8% | Grok 4.6 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 44.8% | 28.9% | GPT-6 Sol |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 82.0% | 86.5% | Grok 4.6 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.7% | 81.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| DTBench | 97.3% | 97.3% | Tie |
| LMCA | 59.1% | 48.5% | GPT-6 Sol |
| Furniture assembly | 58.3% | 40.0% | GPT-6 Sol |
| LMArena Text | 1398 | 1429 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1413 | 1431 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1378 | 1426 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | 1263 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1396 | 1433 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1388 | 1420 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1412 | 1476 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1379 | 1426 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1377 | 1378 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1336 | 1391 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1399 | 1455 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1387 | 1414 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1402 | 1421 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1372 | 1430 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1414 | 1425 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1416 | 1456 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1389 | 1429 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1373 | 1421 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1229 | 1270 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1289 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1258 | 1272 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1270 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1219 | 1262 | Grok 4.6 |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1452 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-6 Sol | SpaceXAI Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | xAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | 82.8 | 76.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.82 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than Grok 4.6 for coding?
Pick GPT-6 Sol for coding: it scores 82.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 76.4 for Grok 4.6. Pick Grok 4.6 when output tokens cost 1.7x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Grok 4.6?
GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Sol or Grok 4.6?
GPT-6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.6 comparison based on?
98 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6 Sol's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.6's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.