Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hy4

GPT-6.1 Sol leads Hy4 on coding, 82.3 to 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 8.0x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
Coding
82.3
Overall
82.0
Output $/M
$10.00
3
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
3
vs boards won of 6 shared

GPT-6.1 Sol or Hy4: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for coding: it scores 82.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.2 for Hy4.

Pick Hy4 for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
6
GPT-6.1 Sol only
105
Hy4 only
0
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Sol 82.3 from 5 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 14.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): GPT-6.1 Sol 55.0% against Hy4 39.4%, 20.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Sol $10.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Sol takes 1.05M tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6.1 SolBarsHy4Ties
Coding20
Agentic work03
General10
All shared boards33
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev1751Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)55.0%39.4%GPT-6.1 Sol
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)88.9%81.0%GPT-6.1 Sol
Code migration (Vals AI)65.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
IOI (Vals AI)96.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SciCode55.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
FrontierCode50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ALE-Bench2743.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: coding1486Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1481Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: React1752Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1796Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1702Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SWE-Bench Pro V296.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
GameBench 291.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 4.058.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
AA Intelligence Index54.6Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Epoch Capabilities Index168.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1278Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1232Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1489Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1401Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1295Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench research83.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench browser93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench long agentic68.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.8%34.4%Hy4
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%41.4%Hy4
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)6.3%12.5%Hy4
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Vals Science Index59.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)28.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
APEX-Agents60.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SpireClimb24.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
LiveBench reasoning92.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ARC-AGI-294.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Chess puzzles68.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Mystery game puzzles80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
EBR-bench54.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1467Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: expert1499Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1469Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1306Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: homework1356Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
GoBench2379Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 393.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tier 4100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ProofBench99.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1515Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MathArena84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)48.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SimpleQA Verified73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1431Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1474Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1449Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite74.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
PRBench Finance46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
PRBench Legal47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1313Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: UI components1341Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: game dev1413Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: data viz1285Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: 3D1435Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: all code categories1358Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench design82.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
Vals Index63.9%59.4%GPT-6.1 Sol
LiveBench data analysis82.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMCA62.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Furniture assembly80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1467Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1425Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision1288Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: non-English1436Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1414Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Korean1440Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: French1464Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Russian1457Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1463Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1428Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1289Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MultiChallenge82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
EQ-Bench 41272Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol$0.0070Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol$0.130Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol$0.500Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy4
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 SolTencent Hy4
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.2505
Coding index82.365.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Hy4 for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol for coding: it scores 82.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.2 for Hy4. Pick Hy4 for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Hy4?

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Sol or Hy4?

GPT-6.1 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hy4 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-tencent-hy4" title="GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hy4</a></p>