Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads GPT-5 on coding, 61.1 to 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Step 5 Preview costs 3.7x less per output token ($2.70 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5OpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
51.5
Output $/M
$10.00
2
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
35
vs boards won of 37 shared

GPT-5 or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.8 for GPT-5.

Pick GPT-5 for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Shared results
37
GPT-5 only
76
Step 5 Preview only
24
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 38.8 from 3 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 22.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5 20.1% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 50.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 $10.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 takes 400K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Reasoning15
Math03
Knowledge04
General117
All shared boards235
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
Aider polyglot88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SWE-bench Verified74.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev14181567Step 5 Preview
AA Coding Index37.8Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.1%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Terminal-Bench49.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GSO-Bench6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
WeirdML60.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
ALE-Bench807.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14361485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14201473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML14271556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.043.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index150.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
METR time horizons69.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Remote Labor Index1.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GDPval34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
BALROG32.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
DeepResearch Bench49.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
BrowseComp-Plus80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.5%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
ARC-AGI65.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
ARC-AGI-29.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SimpleBench56.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Chess puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Mystery game puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
VPCT66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14191485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14191454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams12521308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12781265GPT-5
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME93.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)96.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
AA Math Index94.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME91.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 355.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
ProofBench18.0%42.0%Step 5 Preview
MATH level 598.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: math14071458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14051460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro86.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SimpleQA Verified50.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GeoBench81.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: science14161454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14131439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14311437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14001435Step 5 Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite56.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1184Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1177Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1185Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1221Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1055Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1167Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index117
General benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)43.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
IFBench73.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.2%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMCA40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Fiction.LiveBench97.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text14061440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13881438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13651409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision12321265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English14091447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13971428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14221500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1416Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese14091383GPT-5
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: French14091438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13991441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14071433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1431Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14261437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13991449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13841425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13791412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English12311290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1267Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12461282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1219Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1212Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1263Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5$0.0063Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5$0.092Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5$0.350Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerOpenAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.70
Coding index38.861.1
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.39Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.8 for GPT-5. Pick GPT-5 for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 or Step 5 Preview?

GPT-5 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="GPT-5 vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5 vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>