Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mistral Large 2407

GPT-5.6 Sol leads Mistral Large 2407 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 47.0 to 7.6, and Mistral Large 2407 costs 3.3x less per output token ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
Coding
73.5
Overall
74.7
Output $/M
$20.00
10
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

GPT-5.6 Sol or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a coding score, 73.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
10
GPT-5.6 Sol only
129
Mistral Large 2407 only
7
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.6 Sol 73.5 from 6 benchmarks, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 91.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-5.6 Sol 100.0% against Mistral Large 2407 8.5%, 91.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.6 Sol $20.00 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.6 SolBarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Math10
General30
All shared boards100
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index29 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
LiveBench coding89.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev1616Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
AA Coding Index77.4Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Code migration (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
IOI (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)85.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.7%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SciCode57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)65.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierCode47.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierSWE32.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GSO-Bench76.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
WeirdML88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MirrorCode20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ALE-Bench2176.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1489Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: React1620Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1618Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1609Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SciCode10.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence Index47.07.6GPT-5.6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index162.8Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Agentic Index50.2Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1261Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1248Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1240Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1260Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building games1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1236Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1215Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench research54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench browser88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench long agentic48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)30.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vals Science Index41.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
τ²-Bench Telecom85.1%33.0%GPT-5.6 Sol
OSWorld 2.027.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
BALROG60.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
PostTrainBench36.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,619Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Search1261Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond95.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench reasoning91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%47.2%GPT-5.6 Sol
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)49.5%2.9%GPT-5.6 Sol
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.5%49.0%GPT-5.6 Sol
ARC-AGI97.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ARC-AGI-292.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SimpleBench64.8%22.5%GPT-5.6 Sol
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Mystery game puzzles58.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
EBR-bench44.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1483Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: expert1517Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1477Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1305Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: homework1305Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%8.5%GPT-5.6 Sol
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 389.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FrontierMath, tier 482.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
ProofBench83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro89.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1455Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1431Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1476Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1457Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: websites1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: UI components1335Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: game dev1367Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: data viz1322Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: 3D1384Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: all code categories1341Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: SVG1314Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1304Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LiveBench design81.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Vals Multimodal Index72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
IFBench72.7%31.6%GPT-5.6 Sol
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%2.0%GPT-5.6 Sol
DTBench95.7%61.2%GPT-5.6 Sol
LMCA58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Surface Evolver Bench93.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Furniture assembly56.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text1457Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1483Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision1281Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: English1457Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: non-English1451Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1525Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: German1476Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Korean1442Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: French1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1443Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Russian1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: Polish1459Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1461Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1481Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1462Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1450Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1313Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1290Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: humor1246Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
LMArena Document1483Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol$0.014Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol$0.260Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol$1.00Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.6 SolMistral Large 2407
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026November 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$20.00$6.00
Coding index73.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$1.20Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a coding score, 73.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Mistral Large 2407?

GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Sol only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Mistral Large 2407?

GPT-5.6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.6 Sol's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next