GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 costs 3.3x less per output token than GPT-5.6 Sol Pro ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Grok 4.7: which to pick
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-5.6 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens) and work measured by Chess puzzles or FrontierMath, tier 4, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 5
- GPT-5.6 Sol Pro only
- 2
- Grok 4.7 only
- 94
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 46.4.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1254.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a Vals Index result, 58.6%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.7
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro $0.014, Grok 4.7 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.6 Sol Pro not benchmarked, Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 63.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro 80.5% against Grok 4.7 17.1%, 63.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.6 Sol Pro $20.00 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.6 Sol Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Bars | Grok 4.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| All shared boards | 3 | 1 | 1 tie |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 84.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1637 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.9% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 57.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 29.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| WeirdML | 89.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1432 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1421 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1663 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1627 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1586 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 46.4 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 154.4 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 86.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 60.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 50.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 34.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 34.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 51.4% | 54.6% | Grok 4.7 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $10,537 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 82.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 92.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 90.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 61.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SimpleBench | 71.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured |
| Chess puzzles | 68.0% | 41.0% | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 29.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1415 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1439 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1427 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1254 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1309 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 98.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 80.5% | 17.1% | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1414 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1435 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 56.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1419 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1395 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1423 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1389 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1254 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1275 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1313 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1235 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1270 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1271 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 78.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 58.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.9% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 89.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 80.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| DTBench | 96.0% | 96.0% | Tie |
| LMCA | 59.2% | 49.4% | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 20.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1399 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1406 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1381 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1231 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1411 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1386 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1449 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1366 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1359 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1383 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1431 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1406 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1399 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1420 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1394 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1416 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1394 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1376 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1229 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1250 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1241 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1217 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol Pro | SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | xAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 9, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 66.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.6 Sol Pro better than Grok 4.7 for coding?
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.6 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens) and work measured by Chess puzzles or FrontierMath, tier 4, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Grok 4.7?
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Grok 4.7?
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.