Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

GPT-5.6 Luna leads Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.3 to 7.3, and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.75 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
58.0
Overall
61.6
Output $/M
$1.20
4
Qwen3 VL 8B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct: which to pick

Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.20 per million).

Shared results
4
GPT-5.6 Luna only
116
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct only
7
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.6 Luna 58.0 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 50.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-5.6 Luna 83.7% against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 33.3%, 50.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct $0.75 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.6 LunaBarsQwen3 VL 8B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index25 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev1518Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
AA Coding Index71.4Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)93.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)11.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.3%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
SciCode53.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
FrontierCode39.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
WeirdML60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ALE-Bench1667.4Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: React1508Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1517Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index37.37.3GPT-5.6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities Index156.5Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index42.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench research51.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agentic30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vals Science Index25.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.2%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
BALROG45.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,095Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench reasoning85.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)14.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%57.9%GPT-5.6 Luna
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.5%3.8%GPT-5.6 Luna
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SimpleBench46.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Chess puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1451Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expert1478Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1273Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homework1282Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark49.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured30.7Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 382.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 461.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
ProofBench60.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: math1459Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1470Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.9%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science1433Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1399Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite35.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1255Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: UI components1248Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: game dev1195Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: data viz1212Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: 3D1121Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: all code categories1230Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: SVG1193Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1142Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LiveBench design76.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Vals Multimodal Index69.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
IFBenchNot measured39.9%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.7%33.3%GPT-5.6 Luna
DTBench89.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMCA48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Surface Evolver Bench61.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Furniture assembly42.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text1431Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1437Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1396Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision1257Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-English1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1470Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: German1455Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: French1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Russian1427Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Polish1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1434Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1419Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1402Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: English1263Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1294Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1264Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: humor1190Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1257Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
LMArena Document1457Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
EQ-Bench 41156Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.015Fits in one request

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna$0.052Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.058Fits in one request

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026October 14, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.25
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.75
Coding index58.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.04Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for coding?

Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Luna only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.6 Luna's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next