Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 82.2 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 8.0x less per output token ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
49.2
Output $/M
$1.25
0
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
8
vs boards won of 8 shared

GPT-5.4 Nano or Kimi K3.1 Pro: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
8
GPT-5.4 Nano only
75
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 86.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: GPT-5.4 Nano 5.0% against Kimi K3.1 Pro 91.0%, 86.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 NanoBarsKimi K3.1 ProTies
Coding03
Agentic work02
Reasoning01
Math01
General01
All shared boards08
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1695Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured63.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)26.1%84.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)14.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured81.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)41.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SciCode47.2%60.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
WeirdML49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-Bench1004.51932.8Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: coding1404Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1402Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1701Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1706Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured46.0Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Agentic Index16.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench researchNot measured77.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured75.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured39.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.0%24.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)6.3%37.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.7%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured31.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured44.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom76.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.3%52.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)78.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI51.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1380Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expert1396Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1387Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homework1225Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 344.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ProofBench5.0%91.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: math1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1409Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MathArenaNot measured59.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science1374Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1369Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1367Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1325Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1400Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1410Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1300Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1451Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1354Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1328Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured77.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured62.5%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal Index47.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBench75.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.7%86.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBench80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCA36.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text1372Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1362Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1314Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-English1359Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1391Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: German1367Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1343Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Korean1320Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: French1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian1362Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Polish1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1382Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1365Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1337Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1325Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: English1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1232Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1204Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humor1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoKimi K3.1 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Nano and Kimi K3.1 Pro
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 NanoMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 Pro
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 23, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.25$10.00
Coding index44.882.2
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.14Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro" title="GPT-5.4 Nano vs Kimi K3.1 Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Nano vs Kimi K3.1 Pro</a></p>