Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M2.1

GPT-5.4 Mini leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 3.8x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
44.0
Output $/M
$4.50
11
MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
5
vs boards won of 16 shared

GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2.1: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $0.70).

Shared results
16
GPT-5.4 Mini only
73
MiniMax M2.1 only
18
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 17.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-5.4 Mini 52.3% against MiniMax M2.1 28.8%, 23.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, MiniMax M2.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsMiniMax M2.1Ties
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning30
Math10
Knowledge22
General20
All shared boards115
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
LMArena WebDev1397Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%81.8%MiniMax M2.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%74.8%MiniMax M2.1
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCode52.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%28.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
Terminal-BenchNot measured36.6%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierCode27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.6623.8GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1419Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.120.9GPT-5.4 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Agentic Index17.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%85.4%MiniMax M2.1
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
GPQA Diamond83.1%78.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%83.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%23.2%GPT-5.4 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles11.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1424Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1435Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1285Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
AIME95.6%77.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured82.7Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
MMLU Pro84.5%87.0%MiniMax M2.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%55.8%MiniMax M2.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%58.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%66.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1414Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1201Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1220Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1134Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1206Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1164Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1190Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1131Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%69.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%67.7%GPT-5.4 Mini
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMCA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1375Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1441Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1393Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1222Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and MiniMax M2.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniMiniMax M2.1
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026December 23, 2025
Context window400K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.50$1.20
Coding index35.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved task$0.70$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than MiniMax M2.1 for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $0.70).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2.1?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.70 and MiniMax M2.1 $0.59.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2.1?

GPT-5.4 Mini, with 400K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M2.1 comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next