Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads GPT-5.1-Codex on coding, 62.4 to 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 1.7x less per output token ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
16
vs boards won of 16 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex for a lower cost per solved task ($0.892 against $1.32).

Shared results
16
GPT-5.1-Codex only
10
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
97
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 36.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.1-Codex 13.1% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 64.7%, 51.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-CodexBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work03
Reasoning02
Web design05
General01
All shared boards016
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev13371674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%64.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13461649Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.745.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps10181300Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps10861305Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11911224Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1202Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1258Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured937Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1512Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11621275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components12371340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev11381313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz12131282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1337Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categories11521293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1460Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1464Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding index15.362.4
Independent measurements behind it25
Cost per solved task$0.892$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 15.3 for GPT-5.1-Codex. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex for a lower cost per solved task ($0.892 against $1.32).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.1-Codex costs $0.892 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>