Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads GPT-4o-mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 46.3 to 6.7, and GPT-4o-mini costs 1.4x less per output token ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million).

Shared results
2
GPT-4o-mini only
27
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
71
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 45.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o-mini 4.2% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 49.4%, 45.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1625Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCodeNot measured60.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1158.1Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1533Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1528Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1639Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1616Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.746.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1290Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%49.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1541Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1520Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured70.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1500Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1485Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1308Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1340Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1314Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1336Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1330Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1317Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured57.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured86.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1504Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1474Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1479Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1501Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerOpenAIXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024September 21, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.435
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.87
Coding indexNot benchmarked65.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.87 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next