Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads GPT-4o-mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.9 to 6.7, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.28 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
GPT-4o-mini only
27
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
64
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 31.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GPT-4o-mini 6.7 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 37.9, 31.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1634Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1499Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1648Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1641Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.737.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1475Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1496Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1493Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1478Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1462Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1454Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1452Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1431Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1458Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1359Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1480Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1409Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1455Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1447Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1459Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1424Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1415Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerOpenAIXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024September 21, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.7
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next