Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs Muse Spark Open

GPT-4o-mini costs 7.1x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

GPT-4o-mini or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
3
GPT-4o-mini only
26
Muse Spark Open only
25
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 43.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o-mini 42.6% against Muse Spark Open 89.0%, 46.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index11.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%43.9%Muse Spark Open
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1317Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1294Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next